One to one help sessions for violent domestic abusers

In a bid to alter their behaviours, men who pose a high risk of domestic violence are to be given one-to-one support to promote change.

Known as ‘Drive’ the new programme will be piloted in Essex, Sussex and South Wales.

Ms Williams - a previous victim of such crimes - supports the initiative saying - “We’ve got to try and change the mindset of the perpetrator and hold them accountable for their actions.”

Although another woman who experienced a “hellish five-year marriage to an abusive man” argues that the Drive scheme would not work and that the money would be better spent on support for the victims, saying “ The majority - although not all - of serial perpetrators of domestic violence do it out of choice, not because they have a drug, alcohol, social or financial problems”.

The chief executive of Refuge - Sandra Horley seemed to agree and commented that there was “no evidence - here or abroad - that therapy programmes for violent partners work….on the face of it, it seems like a worthy thing to do.  In an ideal world we would approach it from both sides.  But we don’t live in an ideal world.”

The Drive programme will give individuals bespoke one-to-one sessions and it is expected that 900 offenders will be asked to take part in the scheme over the next three years.

To read the full article on this story covered by BBC News please click here.

Legal challenge lost for heterosexual couple who wanted a civil partnership rather than marriage

On the 29th January 2016, the BBC reported that Rebecca Steinfeld and Charles Keidan have had their claim dismissed by Justice Andrews.

Amongst other arguments against their claim, the government fought the point that now that gay couples are able to marry, civil partnerships might well be abolished or phased out in the future. I would however note at this point that it was said at an earlier heading, that the future of civil partnerships had not been decided - with the government waiting to see ‘how extending marriage to same -sex couples impacts upon civil partnerships before reaching a decision on the future of civil partnerships’.

Justice Andrews also concluded in her ruling that: ”opposite-sex couples are not disadvantaged by the hiatus, because they can achieve exactly the same recognition of their relationship and the same rights, benefits and protections by getting married, as they always could,"

After the ruling, Ms Steinfeld said the government was "barring us, and many thousands of opposite-sex couples like us, from the choice of forming a civil partnership".  Mr Keidan said "the fight goes on" and there was still a chance "for this wrong to be righted in time".